Tom Eastep wrote: > Michael Cozzi wrote: >> On Sun, 2007-07-08 at 16:29 -0700, Tom Eastep wrote: >>> So please help us help you and: >>> >>> a) Collect the output of "shorewall dump" as described at >>> http://www.shorewall.net/support.htm#Guidelines >>> >>> b) Explain to us how this configuration is failing. >>> >> Thank you Tom, I'll try to be more meticulous about this. >> >> I'm unable to get any connection out of the network on either the >> 192.168.0.0 network or 192.168.1.0 network. Communication from the >> firewall is fine, through the interface that has a gateway assigned to >> it. >> >> What I'm trying to have happen here is having the networks 192.168.0.0 >> and 192.168.1.0 be masq'd to separate providers, no balancing, just >> straight NAT. >> >> The dump is attached. Thanks again. > > Another user has already spotted the problem that is preventing local > lan access to the net and has posted a solution on the list.
Basically, you have defined NAT for two pairs of interfaces while you have defined routing rules for two different pairs. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
