Tom Eastep wrote:
> mattjackets wrote:
>> On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 07:39:36 -0700, "Tom Eastep" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> said:
>>> mattjackets wrote:
>>>> I hope this is a quick question for the experts...I'm at a loss as to
>>>> how to do this:
>>>> Drop packets with dest port 4321 with the rst flag set.
>>>>
>>>> Here's what the rule I have in mind would look like (iptables -L)
>>>> target     prot opt source               destination         
>>>> DROP       tcp  --  anywhere             anywhere            tcp
>>>> dpt:4321 flags:RST/RST 
>>>>
>>>> How can this be done in the shorewall rules file?  or do I need to
>>>> create a special macro or something?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Use an Action defined with an Extension script. The best short example is
>>> probably this one:
>>>
>>> http://www.shorewall.net/3.0/shorewall_extension_scripts.htm#NFQUEUE
>>>
>>> -Tom
>>
>> Tom,
>>
>> I quickly scanned the document you linked, and have a few questions.
> 
> I've spent thousands of hours designing, writing and documenting
> Shorewall. Please do me the courtesy of reading the documentation
> carefully and completely before asking for me to spend more of my time
> helping you.
> 

In a second email, I referred you to another article about Actions --
that is the document that you should be reading firest.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep    \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool
Shoreline,     \ http://shorewall.net
Washington USA  \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Public Key   \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems?  Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >>  http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to