On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 05:59:38PM +0000, Andrew Suffield wrote: > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 09:00:20AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > Andrew Suffield wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 07:44:24AM -0800, Tom Eastep wrote: > > >> (or in that most questionable of > > >> Debian ideas, the /var/log/shorewall-init.log file). > > > > > > What's wrong with it? It's essential to debugging a headless server > > > that won't boot cleanly. > > > > The problem with it is that the average Debian Shorewall user has no clue > > that it exists. That coupled with use of /etc/init.d/shorewall rather than > > /sbin/shorewall leads to additional cluelessness. > > I suppose there's no accounting for idiots... still, I don't see how > it could hurt to have it there. > I am in agreement with Andrew.
Regards, -Roberto -- Roberto C. Sánchez http://people.connexer.com/~roberto http://www.connexer.com
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
