Brian J. Murrell wrote: > > I wonder though, if you want to put in a one-time (i.e. capability) test > for the busybox brokenness and only fallback on using bc if the test > fails and just use the shell's integer comparison otherwise.
These hacks aren't in the stable version and I have no intention of including them there. I have them in the current development thread just so I can test them easily in a non-broken environment. > > Anyway, I will patch the shorewall-lite 4 package I am building for > openwrt with the patch. I think that is the proper place to include the hacks since it appears that OpenWRT is the only environment that needs them. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
