>Hi,
>
>I am trying to make connections that go to the firewall (10.10.10.100
>internal) on port TCP/5900 be redirected to an internal host (10.10.10.2)
>but cannot get it to work, the firewall starts ok and shows no errors when
>starting up and there are no log entries in the syslog to suggest that the
>packets are being dropped, could you please advise? I have attached a copy
>of the 'shorewall dump' command.
>
>thanks,

Hi David,

I don't really know how to read Shorewall dumps, but what I saw in your dump
confused me a bit. It appears that the system running Shorewall has only one
configured Ethernet interface (eth0). However, your configuration appears to
be based on a two-interface setup (because your dump includes loc, net, and
fw zones). This isn't necessarily wrong, but unless you have some reason for
having more than two zones (loc and fw), it seems unnecessary to me.

On to your actual problem:
In your interfaces file, add the 'routeback' option to eth0 (I'm sure
someone more experienced than I could tell if this was already enabled based
on the dump)

In your rules file, add the following rule (the '!10.10.10.2' may not be
desirable in your case, but I can't imagine why 10.10.10.2 would try to
connect to 10.10.10.100 when it was trying to access a service that it was
hosting):
DNAT    loc:!10.10.10.2 loc:10.10.10.2  tcp     5900

In your masq file, add the following:
eth0    eth0    10.10.10.100

That should do it.

--Russel Riley



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The NEW KODAK i700 Series Scanners deliver under ANY circumstances! Your
production scanning environment may not be a perfect world - but thanks to
Kodak, there's a perfect scanner to get the job done! With the NEW KODAK i700
Series Scanner you'll get full speed at 300 dpi even with all image 
processing features enabled. http://p.sf.net/sfu/kodak-com
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to