João Kuchnier wrote:
> 
> 2009/6/10 Tom Eastep <teas...@shorewall.net <mailto:teas...@shorewall.net>>
> 
>     João Kuchnier wrote:
>     > Tom,
>     >
>     > Thanks for your help. I manage do configure IPSec connection through
>     > firewall using the rules specified at http://www.shorewall.net/VPN.htm
>     > with nat transversal.
>     >
>     > Now, my only problem is using shorewall on the VPN Server. The rules I
>     > mentioned before are correct?
>     >
>     > RULES
>     > DNAT    all     net:192.168.1.xxx       udp     2000
>     > DNAT    all     net:192.168.1.xxx       udp     2010
>     > DNAT    all     net:192.168.1.xxx       tcp     2004
>     >
>     > I need to nat specific packages coming from VPN connection to another
>     > two servers. This servers needs to respond this packages using the
>     ipsec
>     > tunnel.
> 
>     I'm sorry but I'm completely confused about what you are trying to do.
>     So I can't say whether those rules are correct or not.
> 
> 
> --> Sorry, I will try to explain better...
>  
> 
> 
>     It looks to me like you are trying to use routing/DNAT to 'help' IPSEC
>     where IPSEC could probably do what you want by itself. It strikes me
>     that 192.168.1.xxx will probably send its responses to the redirected
>     requests back through your main firewall rather than through the VPN
>     server which, of course, won't work.
> 
> 
> --> Yes, something like this. The firewall running on the openswan
> server (only one interface), besides accepting every conection, will nat
> three types of connections to two different  servers. On this two
> servers, I created two routes for them to respond vpn incoming packages.
> The gateway of this rules are directed to the openswan server.
> 
> Routes on one of the other servers on dmz...
> 192.168.102.0   192.168.1.224   255.255.255.0   UG    0      0        0 eth2
> 10.201.136.0    192.168.1.224   255.255.248.0   UG    0      0        0 eth2
> 
> Do you think the request response can get through vpn connection?

I don't know. I still don't understand why you have this complicated
configuration with multiple tunnels and DNAT on two different systems.
There has to be a better way, but none of us reading this thread can
figure out what it is you are really trying to accomplish.

So I can only advise you to try the connection and see what happens.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensing option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for externally facing 
server and web deployment.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/businessobjects
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to