Cool, thanks! All clear now... And yes, I should have looked it up in there myself before mailing back...
Cheers! -----Original Message----- From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: maandag 12 april 2010 22:54 To: Shorewall Users Subject: Re: [Shorewall-users] Using the limit action on a DNAT rule to prevent DoS attackson a specific port S. J. van Harmelen wrote: > Thanks for your quick response Tom! But just so do I understand correctly: > > Can I just use both rules at the same time? > Does the 'DNAT-' mean something else than 'DNAT'? man shorewall-rules. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
