Hello folks

I have as DNAT configuration issue that I like to submit to your 
experiences and see why it is not working

here is my network layout

int-machine (INT-NET.IP1) ----- (INT-NET.IP2) int-FW (DMZ-NET.IP2) 
--------------- (DMZ-NET.IP3) dmz-machine
                                                                  |
                                                              (DMZ-NET.IP1)
                                                                ext-FW
                                                                  |
                                                               internet
                                                                  |
                                                             client public IP



dmz-machine has a public address accessible from my client public IP

What I am trying to achieve is to redirect all incoming traffic on 
dmz-machine:port1 to int-machine:port1
and dmz machine is running shorewall+ulogd for that matter and external 
security issues

Note that the dmz-machine is mono interfaced which might be the cause of 
my problem but you'll tell me

I do not own the Firewalls (int-FW and ext-FW) but rules have been 
configured properly as:

- incomming traffic from client to dmz-machine on port1 is running because
     telnet dmz-machine port1+ tcpdump + shorewall ulog tail -f show 
proper traces and
     nc -l DMZ-NET.IP3 port1 running on dmz-machine receives the packets 
from my telnet connection

- incomming traffic from dmz-machine to int-machine on port1 is running 
because
     telnet DMZ-NET-IP2 port1+ tcpdump + shorewall ulog tail -f show 
proper traces and
     nc -l INT-NET.IP1port1 running on int-machine receives the packets 
from my telnet connection

the rules I wrote in /etc/shorewall rules are

ACCEPT       net:client-public-IP            net:DMZ-NET.IP2        tcp    port1
DNAT:ULOG    net:client-public-IP            net:DMZ-NET.IP2:port1  tcp    
port1    -    DMZ-NET.IP3


in the /var/log/ulogd/ulogd.syslogemu I can see
May  6 14:45:27 factory Shorewall:net_dnat:DNAT: IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=....  
SRC=client-public-IP DST=DMZ-NET.IP3 LEN=60 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 TTL=51 
ID=64859 CE DF PROTO=TCP SPT=45343 DPT=port1 SEQ=3031743659 ACK=0 
WINDOW=5840 SYN URGP=0
but no other messages can be seen

Note that I had not put the accept rule in the 1st place and got
May  6 15:41:15 factory Shorewall:FORWARD:REJECT: IN=eth0 OUT=eth0 
MAC=....  SRC=client-public-IP DST=DMZ-NET.IP2 LEN=60 TOS=00 PREC=0x00 
TTL=50 ID=24825 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=56811 DPT=port1 SEQ=3334722914 ACK=0 
WINDOW=5840 SYN URGP=0
therefore the rule seems to remove this traces

the packet never makes it to int-machine (empty tcpdump outpout)
tcpdump on dmz-machine only shows incoming traffic and no other traffic 
not even on lo interface :-(

zones shorewall cfg file
#ZONE   TYPE            OPTIONS         IN                      OUT
#                                       OPTIONS                 OPTIONS
fw      firewall
net     ipv4

interfaces shorewall cfg file
#ZONE   INTERFACE       BROADCAST       OPTIONS
net     eth0            detect          tcpflags,logmartians,nosmurfs

policy shorewall cfg file
#SOURCE DEST    POLICY          LOG     LIMIT:          CONNLIMIT:
#                               LEVEL   BURST           MASK
$FW             net             ACCEPT
net             $FW             DROP            ULOG
net             all             DROP            ULOG
# The FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE LAST
all             all             REJECT          ULOG

nat&  hosts shorewall cfg files are empty


I also tried to use the infos provided in
http://www.shorewall.net/manpages/shorewall-nesting.html

but this lead to the same behaviour

I also tried sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1 without any more success

Does someone has a clue on what is wrong or if it is possible at all

Thanks


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to