On 9/4/10 11:23 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> Shorewall does not currently support the SECMARK and CONNSECMARK targets. >> > Are there any plans to introduce these in Shorewall? > > I see one suggestion I have made about 3 months ago (blacklists to > include both outgoing and incoming connections) has been implemented in > the latest version of Shorewall, what are the chances that SECMARK and > CONNSECMARK will see the light of day in the Shorewall domain?
I'll see what I can do for the next beta release if you would be willing to test it. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by: Show off your parallel programming skills. Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
