On 9/5/10 12:00 PM, Mr Dash Four wrote:
> 
>>
>> So this isn't really a firewall -- it's a host that happens to run
>> Shorewall. That is not a use case that I target with Shorewall, although
>> Shorewall can be used there.
>>   
> It won't make a big difference whether this rogue code executes on a
> single host 'that happens to run Shorewall' or if it resides on a
> firewall with 3+ different interfaces, controlling 3+ different networks
> - that traffic (initiated from the rogue code) still originates from
> that machine and is destined to the outside world.

If there are no applications running on the firewall, then the fw->net
ruleset can be very restricted; no outgoing blacklist is necessary.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net Dev2Dev email is sponsored by:

Show off your parallel programming skills.
Enter the Intel(R) Threading Challenge 2010.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-thread-sfd
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to