On 05/18/2011 06:32 AM, Mr Dash Four wrote: > >> The attached patch omits the 'quantum' specification when adding an SFQ >> qdisc subordinate to an HFSC class. >> > Before I delve in and apply this patch I wanted to know whether > increasing the umax value (deliberately or not) is a good thing or a bad > thing with the configuration I have as it was my understanding that umax > is (usually) set to the MTU value on the device to which this flow > relates, which, evidently, isn't the case with what I have seen so far, > so there must be a reason as to why that is.
The quantum on the subordinate SFQ qdisc has nothing to do with umax. So altering umax won't change that quantum, with or without the patch. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C++ and Fortran developers boost performance applications - including clusters. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
