On 06/19/2012 11:41 PM, Slava wrote: > > TE> Slava wrote: >>> Hello. >>> I am trying to do incoming traffic shaping with Squid-Tproxy-imq: >>> >>> local net -> Tproxy (Squid) -> output connmark 0x81 -> i-net prerouting >>> restore -> imq -> filter >>> >>> DIVERT rule add MARK> 0xff, let OR 0x200, MARK become 0x281 >>> >>> But in tcclasses i must use mark 1..255 and can't use MASK >>> It is possible to do such config to work? May be i was inattentive >>> and missed options in doc > > TE> Take a look at > TE> http://www.shorewall.net/PacketMarking.html#Values. It explains > TE> the layout of packet marks in Shorewall. > > TE> -Tom > > Yes, i read and try various combination, but DIVERT select higher > bits. Or i must write my own divert ?
Sorry -- I don't understand what problem you are trying to solve. What is the purpose of the connmark 0x81? How are you diverting traffic from the local net to Squid? With an entry in /etc/shorewall/providers? If so, then the builtin DIVERT target will redirect the replies back to Squid automatically. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
