HI!!

today All routed traffic pass for L3 cisco. Linux with shorewall only return 
network how know to L3.
But the error persist :(

Cisco L3 is the default GW for all lan networks 192.168.x.x 10.0.x.x

________________________________________
De: Tom Eastep <[email protected]>
Enviado: lunes, 17 de febrero de 2014 18:05
Para: [email protected]
Asunto: Re: [Shorewall-users] incoming  block connections

On 2/17/2014 9:32 AM, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 2/17/2014 9:10 AM, Rodrigo Cortes wrote:
>> Hi!!! behind firewall exist a Layer 3 cisco, this cisco switch
>> routing have default gateway to firewall. Then firewall need send
>> routes back to cisco for correct routing process.
>>
>> is possible some error in this!?
>
> The Cisco has all of the routes it needs -- it is the other systems in
> 192.168.1.0/24 that don't know how to route to 10.*.*.*.
>
> You might try adding the appropriate routes on your servers
> (192.168.1.231, .234 and .239) and see if that helps (although I don't
> see why it should). At any rate, it will cut down on the number of
> entries in your firewall's connection tracking table.

If your 192.168.1.0/24 network is configured using DHCP, you can
configure your DHCP server to distribute RFC-3442 routes to the clients.
That avoids having to configure routes on each local host manually.

-Tom
--
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications
Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls.
Read the Whitepaper.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121054471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to