On 9/24/2014 3:38 PM, PGNd wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014, at 12:37 PM, Tom Eastep wrote:
>>     If ADMINISABSENTMINDED=No, a warning message is issued and the
>>     setting is ignored.
> 
> Noted.  That leaves me unclear as to why the behavior in my example was 
> 'somewhat' sensitive to the setting.  Hm ...

I've taken a look and stopped rules with ADMINISABSENTMINDED=No is
rather messed up. I'll try to sort it out over the next several days.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who
Shoreline,         \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like
Washington, USA     \ all of the passengers in his car
http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to