Notice that for a 'setversion'-specified version

        SW_BUILD_VER=4.6.4.X
        cd /usr/local/src/shorewall-build/release
        setversion ${SW_BUILD_VER}
        git commit -a -m "test"

using otherwise UNmodified *spec files

        cd /usr/local/src/shorewall-build/BUILD/${SW_BUILD_VER}
        touch shorewall-pkg.config
        /usr/local/src/shorewall-build/tools/build/build46 -tr -cil6Ls 
${SW_BUILD_VER}

The tarballs are named with the specified SW_BUILD_VER, "4.6.4.X"

        ls -1 *tgz
                shorewall-4.6.4.X.tgz
                shorewall6-4.6.4.X.tgz
                shorewall6-lite-4.6.4.X.tgz
                shorewall-core-4.6.4.X.tgz
                shorewall-init-4.6.4.X.tgz
                shorewall-lite-4.6.4.X.tgz

but the rpms are named with "4.6.4-X", not "4.6.4.X"

        cd /usr/src/packages/RPMS/noarch/
        ls -1 shorewall*rpm
                shorewall-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm
                shorewall6-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm
                shorewall6-lite-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm
                shorewall-core-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm
                shorewall-init-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm
                shorewall-lite-4.6.4-X.noarch.rpm

Trivial to override locally, but is it intended?  Should those not be 
consistently numbered by the packaging script?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to