On 12/17/2014 4:52 PM, jone...@teksavvy.com wrote: > To DSCP-mark the packets of a tunnel (not the packets inside) then > the egress interface by which the tunnel is going would be added to TC > as a device, a default TC class created, then a single rule with > whichever DSCP value configured, basically. Does this sound OK ?
Yes. > Is there any catch with working with tunnels ? Not so long as you mark the packet after encapsulation. > > About tcrules and DSCP, what is the planned life of DSCP inside > tcrules before it gets obsoleted in favor of the mangle config file ? > At least another year. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT Server from Actuate! Instantly Supercharge Your Business Reports and Dashboards with Interactivity, Sharing, Native Excel Exports, App Integration & more Get technology previously reserved for billion-dollar corporations, FREE http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=164703151&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
