On 6/5/2015 11:53 AM, Simon Hobson wrote: > Jean-Marc Liotier <[email protected]> wrote: > >> So, if I don't misunderstand, all the IPv6 packets ultimately end up as >> a a single sub-tree of whichever class the IPv4 protocol 41 packet is >> classified in. Hmmm... Not what I want... But I guess that it is a >> structural limitation of having IPv6 going through its own interface. > AIUI that's correct. > > I wonder if it's possible to route traffic via an IFB (a virtual interface) > before the IP6 traffic goes into the tunnel (after it comes out of the tunnel > for inbound traffic). Adds complication and restrictions, but might allow > combined TC processing for IP4 and Ip6 together. >
You might get uniform ingress control with an IBF but not egress. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ When I die, I want to go like my Grandfather who Shoreline, \ died peacefully in his sleep. Not screaming like Washington, USA \ all of the passengers in his car http://shorewall.net \________________________________________________
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
