Hi Tom Than
Am 07.10.2015 um 19:48 schrieb Tom Eastep: > On 10/7/2015 7:06 AM, Erich Titl wrote: >> Hi Folks >> >> I am seeing this in shorewall-init.log, probably some date template glitch. >> >> Oct 7 13:44:26 Shorewall configuration compiled to /var/lib/.start >> Oct %_d 13:44:26 Starting Shorewall.... >> Oct %_d 13:44:26 Initializing... >> >> gatekeeper# shorewall version >> 4.6.13 >> > > Hi Erich, > > I suspect that the issue is in your version of the 'date' utility. The > Shorewall-generated script is executing this command: > > timestamp=$(date +'%b %_d %T') What about the line before the mangled date stamp, this is the same instance of shorewall, > > On my systems, the result is: > > root@gateway:~# date +'%b %_d %T' > Oct 7 10:44:41 > root@gateway:~# Indeed the output on my system is gatekeeper# date +'%b %_d %T' Oct %_d 19:17:18 gatekeeper# ls -l `which date` lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 12 Oct 7 13:17 /bin/date -> /bin/busybox This is using _real_ date: mega@leafbuilder:~$ date +'%b %_d %T' Okt 7 21:35:02 mega@leafbuilder:~$ date +'%b %e %T' Okt 7 21:35:06 and this is on busybox. gatekeeper# date +'%b %e %T' Oct 7 19:35:35 It looks like the %e format is the same as %_d on the date command and it also works on busybox. YMMV Would you mind to tell me where the date is set, so I can run a test using shorewall? Thanks Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Full-scale, agent-less Infrastructure Monitoring from a single dashboard Integrate with 40+ ManageEngine ITSM Solutions for complete visibility Physical-Virtual-Cloud Infrastructure monitoring from one console Real user monitoring with APM Insights and performance trend reports Learn More http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=247754911&iu=/4140 _______________________________________________ Shorewall-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
