I do have ipsec zone, and it compiles to rules all right:
5   380 vpnpx-fw   all  --  *      *       192.168.0.0/16       0.0.0.0/0
         policy match dir in pol ipsec mode tunnel
it's external IPs and ESP packets I have trouble with.
Thank you.

2016-11-28 16:07 GMT+03:00 Bill Shirley <
[email protected]>:

> Try type ipsec in your zones file:
> #ZONE                   TYPE OPTIONS         IN                      OUT
> sfn                     ipv4
>
> It generates:
>      0     0 fw-sfn     all  --  * *       0.0.0.0/0
> 192.168.4.0/24       policy match dir out pol ipsec
>
> Bill
>
>
> On 11/28/2016 4:38 AM, John Depp wrote:
> > Hello everyone!
> > I'm using Debian, Shorewall and Stongswan on my linux routers.
> > It seems Shorewall don't allow input of ESP packets, formed by ipsec
> initiated by Strongswan.
> >
> > I have the following line tunnels:
> >
> > #TYPE         ZONE        GATEWAY GATEWAY_ZONE
> > ipsec         net         xx.xx.xx.51
> >
> > it compiles to the following iptables rules:
> >
> > ...
> > Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
>  destination
> >   107 28045 eth0_in    all  --  eth0   * 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>
> 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>
> > ...
> > Chain eth0_in (1 references)
> >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
>  destination
> > ...
> >   101 27583 net-fw     all  --  *      * 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>
> 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>            policy match dir
> > in pol none
> > ...
> > Chain net-fw (1 references)
> >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
>  destination
> >    12  2213 ACCEPT     all  --  *      * 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>
> 0.0.0.0/0 <http://0.0.0.0/0>            ctstate
> > RELATED,ESTABLISHED
> >     0     0 ACCEPT     esp  --  *      * xx.xx.xx.51 0.0.0.0/0 <
> http://0.0.0.0/0>
> >     0     0 ACCEPT     udp  --  *      * xx.xx.xx.51 0.0.0.0/0 <
> http://0.0.0.0/0>            udp dpt:500 ctstate NEW,UNTRACKED
> >
> > And the packets never hit the net-fw chain, rejected by policy:
> > Nov 28 12:24:47 gw kernel: [9640691.231945]
> Shorewall:INPUT:REJECT:IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00: SRC=xx.xx.xx.51 DST=<router>
> LEN=86
> > TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=62 ID=61247 PROTO=4
> >
> > In the case I use the "leftfirewall=yes" option in Strongswan config,
> which inserts it's native iptables rules, it inserts the
> > following:
> > Chain INPUT (policy DROP 0 packets, 0 bytes)
> >  pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source
>  destination
> > ...
> >     0     0 ACCEPT     4    --  eth0   * xx.xx.xx.51        <router>
>     policy match dir in pol ipsec reqid 2 proto 50
> >
> > So I assume there should be no "policy match dir in pol none" option in
> eth0_in chain to correctly process ipsec packets.
> > Similarly, if I add some rules like
> > ACCEPT   net:xx.xx.xx.0/16       $FW                ah
> > ACCEPT   net:xx.xx.xx.0/16       $FW                esp
> > packets never hit those rules too as they are compiled into net-fw chain.
> >
> > So, is there any option to turn off "policy match dir in pol none"
> option in eth0_in chain or am I completely mistaken of the
> > issue?
> >
> > Thanks in advance!
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shorewall-users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Shorewall-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to