On 12/22/2017 08:09 AM, Oliver Freyermuth via Shorewall-users wrote:
> Dear Shorewallers,
> 
> since the problem is rather pinned down already and easy to reproduce, let me 
> try with a minimal bugreport - if more info is really needed, just let me 
> know. 
> 
> I am using shorewall 6, version 5.1.9. 
> 
> If I specify in "interfaces":
> net             +                       dhcp,routeback,optional
> then the ACCEPT rules for 546:547 (DHCPv6) are not created(!). 
> 
> If I specify:
> net             eth0                       dhcp,routeback,optional
> it works fine, and I observe the 546:547 udp rules being created. 
> 
> So the problem only exists if the interface is a "+" matching string (also 
> e.g. "e+" fails). 
> I'm right now helping myself with a macro.DHCPv6 opening 546:547 udp, which I 
> just ACCEPT from net. 
> 

You can also work around the problem by changing your interfaces entry to:

net         all             dhcp,routeback,optional,physical=+

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \   Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with
Shoreline,         \     an international standard?
Washington, USA     \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't
http://shorewall.org \   understand
                      \_______________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to