On 02/11/2018 03:26 PM, Thomas wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> I've reproduced the issue with TCPdump running on Windows server in loc
> (192.168.1.0/24) and remote client (with IP 192.168.200.32).
> The client with working CIFS is also in loc (192.168.1.0/24).
> I have not configured a new zone or anything else related to the VPN
> connection.
> 
> Here's the dump from client:
> thomas@pc5-desktop:~$ sudo tcpdump -i eth0 -n -s0  host win10 and port 445
> tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode
> listening on eth0, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 262144 bytes
> 00:16:15.249437 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: Flags [S],
> seq 3478483138, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 681979375 ecr
> 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
> 00:16:16.277772 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: Flags [S],
> seq 3478483138, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 681980404 ecr
> 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
> 00:16:18.293764 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: Flags [S],
> seq 3478483138, win 29200, options [mss 1460,sackOK,TS val 681982420 ecr
> 0,nop,wscale 7], length 0
> 
> And this is the dump from Windows server:
> c:\Users\thomas\Downloads>windump -D
> 1.\Device\NPF_{85F60C6D-9764-410D-B8D6-C492F4C80984} (Red Hat)
> 
> c:\Users\thomas\Downloads>WinDump.exe -i 1 -n -s 0 port 445
> WinDump.exe: listening on \Device\NPF_{85F60C6D-9764-410D-B8D6-C492F4C80984}
> 00:16:16.277567 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: S
> 3478483138:3478483138(0) win 29200 <mss 1382,sackOK,timestamp 681979375
> 0,nop,wscale 7>
> 00:16:17.299901 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: S
> 3478483138:3478483138(0) win 29200 <mss 1382,sackOK,timestamp 681980404
> 0,nop,wscale 7>
> 00:16:19.315761 IP 192.168.200.32.60098 > 192.168.1.123.445: S
> 3478483138:3478483138(0) win 29200 <mss 1382,sackOK,timestamp 681982420
> 0,nop,wscale 7>
> 

The Windows server is receiving the SYN packets but is not responding.

- Is there a firewall on the server that is blocking requests from
  networks other than 192.168.1.0/24?

- How about the configuration of the CIFS server?

This doesn't look like a Shorewall issue.

-Tom
-- 
Tom Eastep        \   Q: What do you get when you cross a mobster with
Shoreline,         \     an international standard?
Washington, USA     \ A: Someone who makes you an offer you can't
http://shorewall.org \   understand
                      \_______________________________________________

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
Shorewall-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to