On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 01:39:46PM -0700, Tom Eastep wrote:
> On 10/29/18 11:04 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> > On 2018-10-24 23:34, Tom Eastep wrote:
> >> On 10/24/18 9:18 AM, Vincas Dargis wrote:
> >>> What does that mean with regards to Shorewall? Could there potentially
> >>> be incompatibilities on how Shorewall expects Linux firewall to behave?
> >>
> >> There could certainly be incompatibilities that effect Shorewall and/or
> >> Shorewall6.
> > 
> > Any plans to handle this issue? Maybe worth documenting/noting that
> > Debian Buster users are encouraged to use `update-alternatives` system
> > for enabling "old" backend?
> > 
> > Or this should be handled by package maintainers?
> 
> My opinion is that we should address issues as they arise after this
> iptables change migrates to testing. nf_tables is the direction in which
> the Netfilter team are going, and if we immediately direct users to
> switch to the old backend, we only delay resolution of compatibility
> issues. Eventually, the old backend will go away, so we want all known
> issues with the new backend to be resolved by that time.
> 
> I've copied the Debian Shorewall Maintainer for his input.
> 
Tom,

I agree with your approach.  The release team made an announcement last
month detailing the timeline for the Buster release:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2018/09/msg00004.html

The transition freeze does not affect Shorewall, so the date by which we
would need to target a final set of Shorewall packages for Buster would
be February 12th.  Of course, sooner is better as it allows time for
bugs to be discovered by users, reported, and fixed.

I have been quite busy with school and work this semester, but once
final exams are over I should have some time to be able to get back to
Shorewall packaging.  I also have not messed with Buster at all, but I
can plan to setup a VM for testing as we sort out what changes need to
be made in the packaging.

If we encounter some unsolvable problem, it would seem we would need to
decide between requesting removal of Shorewall from the Buster release
(I would much prefer to avoid that) or to document the fallback to the
old backend.  Either way, a package that works with the new backend
would be the ideal solution.

Regards,

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sánchez
http://people.connexer.com/~roberto
http://www.connexer.com


_______________________________________________
Shorewall-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/shorewall-users

Reply via email to