On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Atte AndrĂ© Jensen <[email protected]> wrote:

> But are there any drawbacks to this strategy? Would it work with my large
> collection of old photos mounted from an usb drive into ~/photos (the
> library location), and what would happen, when that usb suddenly is not
> mounted when the laptop is away from the usb drive? I realize I won't have
> access to the photos when the usb is missing and that shotwell would
> probably report those as missing...
>
> The plan is to mount the same folders on my wifes laptop over NFS. Would
> that work too?
>

Shotwell would report those photos as missing, although they'd show up again
as soon as the drive/connection was re-established.  It's not really the way
we intended Shotwell to be used, but there are plenty of other users who
work this way.


> And now a really hacky idea I got: We would like to share the database (the
> tags, edits and ratings), would it be possible to simply share ~/.shotwell
> in dropbox (with a symlink in place pointing from ~/shotwell to somewhere in
> ~/Dropbox)? I guess that would require the directory structure of ~/photos
> to be exactly the same... Which bad things would happen if we both run
> shutwell at the same time, each accessing and updating ~/.shotwell at the
> same time? If not, are there a better way of looking at the same files,
> working with the same shotwell information (edits, ratings and tags) from
> two or more computers?
>
> And finally: how important is it that the shotwell versions are the same on
> two computers (provided it even works with a shared db somehow)? I'm running
> arch on my laptop, she's using ubuntu (10.10 I think)...
>

This is a very, very bad idea! If you're able to get both Shotwell instances
to run, you would end up with a corrupt DB in the event both were able to
write to it.

However, I do have one piece of good news -- there has been talk recently in
adding a Zeroconf-based mechanism for sharing between two Shotwell instances
over a local network. Keep in mind this isn't yet being developed, but there
is some demand for it and it's still being discussed.

  - Eric
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to