On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 08:32:45AM +0200, Adam Dingle wrote: > On 08/14/2011 08:58 PM, oliver wrote: > >On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Adam Dingle wrote: > >>That's why I recommend sysprof: there's no need to recompile > >>libraries, your program runs at normal speed and it's really easy to > >>use as well. > >Aha, ok. Sounds good. :-) > > > >But it will run without configure's --debug? > >(You mentioned that option...) > > Sysprof will run even if you haven't built your program with debug > symbols, but its results will be most informative if debug symbols > are present. [...]
OK. For gprof I read as a hint, it's better to avoid -pg and -g at the same time. Ciao, Oliver _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
