On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:18 AM, pt <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26 March 2012 23:37, Camilo Polymeris <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> a) Do you think this can & should be implemented as a plugin? > > > Yes, plugin 100%. > > I feel like adding new specialised functions to the Shotwell core it > is not a great idea, especially since there are *basic* > functionalities that are still not there
I wouldn't be adding any new specialized functions (except for lens correction), just moving them to a different pipeline when handling RAWs. I also feel this are basic operations -- but, of course, that depends on how you use shotwell. The GUI would likely remain very similar, only the underlying processing would change. Looking at the code, I think it would be very hard to do all of it as a plugin. I might be wrong, of course. Regards, Camilo _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
