On 28-03-12 00:17, Camilo Polymeris wrote:
I share the concerns, but raw development is something that shotwell already does... but doesn't do "well", as the unix philosophy requires. Should that capability be removed altogether, in your opinion?
One could look at RAW files as being just another type of image file that needs to be indexed/archived/tagged. They should be displayed in Shotwell, just like other image files, but any specialised post-processing that you can do with RAW files should be handled by an external tool. Shotwell can assist in this however by providing a good system for keeping your edits versioned and linked to the original file (the good thing of this is that any filetype and any external tool will benefit from this).
Michiel _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
