On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Eric Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 1:39 AM, Camilo Polymeris <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> So, how could Rawstudio (or similar programs) be brought into this
>> workflow? Duplication of the original raw isn't very practical, so I
>> thought we could add a command line similar to this:
>>
>> rawstudio --input something.raw --output something_developed.jpeg
>>
>> This would fire up rawstudio in a "one image" mode, that is remove
>> every GUI element related to browsing, organization and sharing,
>> including the filmstrip and some menu items, plus automatically save
>> the developed file on exit. Shotwell could then integrate this file
>> into its pipeline, just like it does with something_modified.jpeg
>> files.
>>
>> What do you think? Is this approach feasible? Or am I missing something?
>
>
> Yes, that would be perfect!  When we implemented the multiple RAW
> development feature a while ago, we had this exact scenario in mind.
> Unfortunately none of the RAW developer apps had the ability to operate in a
> "client mode" like this at the time.
>
> If you could get this added to Rawstudio, we'd be very interested in
> adapting Shotwell to support the feature.  It would go a long way towards
> making life better for those of us who shoot RAW photos.

Great. Let's see what the rawstudio devs say.
In the meanwhile I have written a patch[1,2] for rawstudio that
provides this "client mode" functionality. It probably still is less
than optimal, but it is a start.

Camilo

[1]http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/show_bug.cgi?id=556
[2]http://bugzilla.rawstudio.org/attachment.cgi?id=112&action=view
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell

Reply via email to