On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Lorenzo Milesi <[email protected]> wrote: > To be honest, I think investigating this won't be a high priority for > us since we're not huge fans of SMB, but I hope we'll get a ch ance > to look into this more at some point. Cheers -
Thanks for the investigation. About your last statement, do you propose any suggestion to work around this? thanks again! Well, Shotwell wasn't really designed to have library photos on a network drive, and we've done very little testing in that configuration. And there are other known issues with accessing photos over SMB or other protocols, e.g. http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2787 http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/2878 So my strong recommendation is to keep your photos in a directory on a local drive, and to use some sort of file syncing mechanism (such as SparkleShare or Ubuntu One or Dropbox or rsync) to copy them to where you want them to be. At least, Shotwell will be much happier that way today. In the long run, we'd like Shotwell to know how to sync your photo library: http://redmine.yorba.org/issues/1292 But we're not there yet. Cheers - adam _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
