Hi Lucas, Yes I meant the Shotwell Connect function with upload to Flickr. The URL below refers to my testing and the photo title appears in both Flickr fields (the short title and the long description) even though I have something else in Shotwell in the long description field. This is not critical for me as I'm using another program anyway (postr) to publish. I don't use Shotwell Connect towards Flickr because I like to choose sets and groups at the same time as I upload, which is not (yet?) supported by Shotwell Connect.
Currently I use Export from Shotwell, then a script that does some fiddling with metadata on the exported JPEGs, then calls Postr to do the actual upload. A little bit convoluted but it works for me. I was already doing something similar in 0.13. Luc ________________________________ De : Lucas Beeler <[email protected]> À : Luc More <[email protected]> Cc : Jim Nelson <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Envoyé le : Lundi 25 mars 2013 20h41 Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 Hi Luc, > Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. By "Flickr uploader" do you mean the Flickr Connector inside of Shotwell? Cheers, Lucas On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Luc More <[email protected]> wrote: > Now some more findings from further tests with 0.14 built from source on > Ubuntu 12.10: > > 1. Thanks a lot for the new multi-line Description field! I was >missing that a lot in previous versions > 2. Unfortunately the Flickr uploader does not seem to use it. A test >upload (http://www.flickr.com/photos/arzitek/8581349856/) showed the Title >being used in both supported fields on that site. > 3. Moreover, these metadata are no longer written to the JPEG (not >for RAW+JPEG and not for simple JPEG). I'm pretty sure that worked on simple >JPEG in 0.13 (not sure about RAW in old versions). Of course I have the >appropriate option set in Preferences. I don't know if that's a feature, it >looks more like a bug of this early 0.14, could you confirm? > 4. When exporting and selecting the Metadata option, both fields are >exported in the resulting JPEG so I still have the workaround to use an >external program (postr) to upload after exporting. With the added benefit to >be able to use Shotwell to set both Title and Description which is still >better than 0.13. > > > ________________________________ > De : Jim Nelson <[email protected]> > À : Luc More <[email protected]> > Cc : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" > <[email protected]> > Envoyé le : Vendredi 22 mars 2013 20h38 > Objet : Re: [Shotwell] Re : Re: Call for Testing: Shotwell 0.14 > > > This is great to hear. Improving the RAW experience was a top priority for > this release, so it's gratifying to hear that our users are seeing the > difference. > > -- Jim > > On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Luc More <[email protected]> wrote: > > So far so good... I did some testing yesterday with the new RAW features and > am happy to report that the RAW+JPEG pairing works like it should for me. It > shows the camera JPEG, starts Darktable when I asked, imported automatically > the Darktable JPEG. I have 27000+ photos in my library after the upgrade and > very happy camper so far ;-) Luc Envoyé par Yahoo! Mail (sur Android) > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell > _______________________________________________ > Shotwell mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell _______________________________________________ Shotwell mailing list [email protected] http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
