The reply took a while I guess but yes, the problem still exists.
Some imports the thumbnails are mostly grey but some imports they are
mostly good.
I don't think I have seen this problem with files that are directly copied
from camera but only the ones I have converted from h264 to x264 to add
date metadata (with avconv, like 'avconv -y -i oldname.mts -metadata
creation_time="$DATE" -c:a copy -c:v libx264 -crf 18 -preset veryfast
newname.mp4'.
The package is installed:
ii gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad:i386 1.0.6-1ubuntu1
i386 GStreamer plugins from the "bad"
set
And as always: nautlius/nemo always produces good thumbnails from these
files.
Rgds//Thomas
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Clint Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Are you still having problems with this? Please let us know.
>
> Also, just to reconfirm, you have the version of plugins-bad for 1.0
> installed already, right?
>
> Cheers,
> -c
>
> On 12/03/2013, Thomas Novin <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Not very good I guess, I already have "bad thumbnails" so they are not
> > empty.
> >
> >
> https://xyz.pp.se/~thnov/up/Screenshot%20from%202013-03-12%2017:44:09.png
> >
> > However, I still get gray thumbnails on certain videos when I import
> > new ones, even after the issue was closed. But still all is good in
> > Nautilus.
> >
> > Rgds//Thomas
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:03 PM, Clint Rogers <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> Hi Thomas,
> >>
> >> What should happen is that, if you install or update one or more
> >> GStreamer codecs, Shotwell should pick up on this the next time it's
> >> launched, and attempt to thumbnail any video files for which it
> >> doesn't have thumbnails already. There shouldn't be any need to blow
> >> away your other good thumbnails, though.
> >>
> >> Can you try this and let us know if it works?
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> -c
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11/03/2013, Thomas Novin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> My issue is with video-files so I don't think I can do rotate there.
> >>>
> >>> Any other suggestion? Since I have a 20-30k+ library it seems a bit
> >>> hefty to remove all thumbnails just to re-create 100 :)
> >>>
> >>> Rgds//Thomas
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Joseph Bylund <[email protected]
> >
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Thomas,
> >>>> I believe rotate-undo works, the original message says it does not
> work
> >>>> for
> >>>> raw files.
> >>>> http://lists.yorba.org/pipermail/shotwell/2011-November/003309.html
> >>>> -Joe
> >>>>
> >>>> On 03/09/2013 07:48 AM, Thomas Novin wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Hello
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Is it possible to re-generate thumbnails for just some file(s)? I
> have
> >>>>> some bad thumbnails because of Bug #6452 but I want to re-generate
> >>>>> them when I have the fixed version of Shotwell.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rgds//Thomas
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Shotwell mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Shotwell mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> ---------------------------
> >> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they
> >> were like 'Na Br O'..."
> >
>
>
> --
> ---------------------------
> "I asked if Sodium, Bromine and Oxygen wanted to hang out, but they
> were like 'Na Br O'..."
>
_______________________________________________
Shotwell mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.yorba.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/shotwell
