On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 11:11 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > On 12/23/09 07:27, William Kenworthy wrote: > > > I was able to disable the dimming (an idiot feature that one :(, but > > shr-todays new implementation sucks badly, locking the screen and > > refusing to unlock, fighting with apps like ffalarms so you cant turn > > the alarm off (seems they both want to be "top", with the result you > > cant send shr-today a keystroke. It also dies regularly and doesnt > > appear after suspend. > > The new lock screen works fine for me (once the old shr-today was really > gone and I rebootet), I tested that on my FR for quite a while before > pushing. Sorry to hear that it broke things for you. > It didnt "break things", it was already broke :) - this was not an upgrade but a freshly (self) built image - no updates have come through since I installed it. So no old shr-today to worry about which conversely, since its not an upgrade, may mean something is missing?
> > There also seems to be changes to the way suspend works - now it > > suspends before GSM lock is obtained when booting, with the resultant > > refusal to register until you reboot and keep tapping the screen to stop > > suspension - actually hard to do! > > Yes, this is just the way it behaves now. No amount of testing would > ever have changed that. Actually it always used to behave that way, it > was just that odeviced was so slow in starting up that you had time to > enter your PIN before it suspended, I think. > > I have no idea how suspend can be prevented now. Proabably phonefsod > should be trying to request the CPU resource until GSM registration > suceeds. Care to file a trac ticket to have that implemented? ok, http://trac.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/848 > > > I think these changes should have been tested more before being moved > > from unstable to testing. > > See above, I did test the first and there is little I can do about the > 2nd as long as this is not solved "upstream".... > > spaetz True, testing is hard as you cant check everything in a full image - and this is a testing release! I guess my point is that I am not the only one seeing this, so something is not right. Quick extra question - is there any difference between the images from the build host and the ones I build locally (except for the changes I make myself - minor changes to std shr kernel only to this one so far)? - I am thinking of extra scripts or manual interventions that you may do. BillK _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
