On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 01:26:53PM +0100, Patryk Benderz wrote: > [cut moaning] > > -Not trying to defend ourselves or anything, but keep in mind that SHR > > is not Debian with >1000 active devs. We derive from a highly unstable > > distribution (OpenEmbedded development tree), and much of that is > > outside our control. So stuff changing and disappearing might not always > > be our fault, we cannot check every change that goes into OpenEmbedded > > and we don't have the rights to veto those that we don't like. > I get your point, but what about deriving from stable branch of OE? Is > it out of consideration?
When last stable branch of OE was created, there was no SHR support (distribution configs, our recipes). I've merged last few diffs to org.openembedded.dev branch about a week ago (still few minor changes are only in shr/merge see my e-mail about shr/merge branch status). We hope to get SRCPV merged to oe.dev before stable/2010 is branched from .dev and start building shr-testing/shr-stable from stable/2010 and shr-unstable directly from org.openembedded.dev. This will eliminate annoying workflow overhead we now have (every commit goes to oe.dev, then it should be merged to srcpv branch, then srcpv branch is merged to shr/merge). Regards, -- uin:136542059 jid:[email protected] Jansa Martin sip:[email protected] JaMa _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
