Frederik Sdun skrev:
> Hi,
>
> does this really work for cross compiling? Maybe you should use 
> autotools, which are quite easy and makes it even easier for cross 
> compilation.
I know it looks odd, but it works fine. I successfully built a package 
under shr-unstable and installed it on the freerunner. I've never really 
got to learn autotools, and every time I tries to, it seems the 
tutorials want to teach to much. The manual is also just too much for 
me. I'll try to find a "autotools for dummies" and see if I can learn it.
> Instead of dynamic object you can use libfso-glib[1] and instead using 
> handcrafted paths and busnames you can use libfsoframework's paths [2].
Cool.
> Why did you add the libeflvala vapi to your project? Are there any 
> update/tweak you want to share? libeflvala doesn't make much progress, 
> but if you have any diffs, feel free to send them to 
> [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
No diffs. It's simply an easy way to make it easy to compile. I can just 
./compile and it's compiled for my cpu. Do it through the shr build 
environment and bitbake and you get it for arm. I'm not that experienced 
in crosscompiling, and this "just works".
>
> our docs: http://docs.freesmartphone.org/
> if you're reading this just in time, you might miss the Notification 
> API. This should be there soon, and it seems to be only a small 
> interface with one method.
I'll see if it's something I can use.

Esben
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to