On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 16:42, Sebastian Spaeth <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I agree. Things like that definitely should be voted in coreteam, then
>> announced and discussed by users and other devs, and only if everyone
>> agrees - applied.
>>
>> And personally I'm also against stable release now, sorry ;x
>
> No need to be sorry, I never wanted to become shr-testing maintainer, so
> I won't cry if there is no shr-stable out with my name in the git logs.
>
> I still think that you guys ignore people who only want to make calls
> and who do not like upgrading and debugging their FR. And shr-testing is
> not that. I mean people who want to upgrade once a year!
>
> Stable IMHO does not mean bug-free. It means just that "stable" and that
> is what the old shr-testing snapshot was. But it's not worth spending
> energy on argueing about that. I can build my own image locally.
>
> As for not discussing that in -core, yes that was a mistake. I was just
> giving in to people without thinking too much as so far no one of the
> core team has cared a lot about a -testing or even -stable branch. In my
> Open source world view, those who DO things get a bit to decide on what
> they do. Whatever... it's fine.
>
> spaetz
>

I understand your POV, but look at what was happening with Om2008, and
later with first SHR-testing images. When someone complained about
something in old images, the only answers were "f*** this old sh**,
install new -unstable, it's even more stable than your old -testing
image". I'm sure the same would happen with your stable image (but
well, thanks a lot for maintaining -testing so it's not now what it
was before :))

Feel free to make shr-recommended images, or something like that. Just
don't call it "stable branch", cause as far as I understood from
earlier discussions, we're rather going to Debian like
unstable/testing/stable scheme, instead of just releasing something,
that won't work later.

And... I'll be offtopic now, but I can't understand - if someone wants
"stable image" to install and not touch it over years, then why for
he/she bought a Freerunner? ;o (don't worry, I see making such images
is important, mostly considering non-FR hardware SHR will support in
future, but I think from Freerunner users we can expect more ;))

-- 
Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
dos
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to