On 16 June 2010 14:15, Tom Hacohen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm not an expert when it comes to openbmap-logger, but it seems to me that
> what they did (hackish as it may look) they did for a reason. This doesn't
> look like a mistake. It's too bad
> that they didn't comment that line (and commented other stuff instead), but
> I think asking
> whoever wrote that is in order. Just to make sure: I think your code is
> better than the original,
> I'm just saying you should maybe do some research.
I checked it with mdbus2:
# mdbus2 -s org.freesmartphone.ogsmd /org/freesmartphone/GSM/Device
org.freesmartphone.GSM.Monitor.GetNeighbourCellInformation
( [ { "foffset": 0, "timea": 0, "cba": 0, "bsic": 24, "lac": 63,
"cid": 6593, "ctype": 2, "rac": 1, "rxlevam": 3, "arfcn": 981, "c1":
19, "c2": 19, "cbq": 0, "roffset": 0, "toffset": 0, "rxlev": 20 }, {
"foffset": 534512, "timea": 1972, "cba": 0, "bsic": 27, "lac": 23,
"cid": 44703, "ctype": 2, "rac": 2, "rxlevam": 3, "arfcn": 827, "c1":
7, "c2": 7, "cbq": 0, "roffset": 0, "toffset": 0, "rxlev": 8 } ] )
In the old version, for e.g. cid 6593 I saw an u'19c1'. If you have
some old logfiles from frameworkd you could see that in it too.
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
