On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 10:09:43PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> Martin Jansa <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 09:14:37PM +0100, Neil Jerram wrote:
> >> Secondly, over the last couple of weeks I've been playing myself with
> >> the OpenEmbedded system, and I can see now that the whole system is set
> >> up so as to make taking a conservative approach practically impossible!
> >> There's of the order of 2000 recipes there, and most of the ones that
> >> I've looked at are written so that they always download from the latest
> >> VCS tip.
> >
> > no only exactly 12 recipes are using latest VCS tip in shr-u, see
> > conf/distro/include/shr-autorev.inc
>
> Aha, I think we're getting near the problem now, thanks.
>
> I see those 12 recipes there. But they are not the only ones using
> ${AUTOREV}. I also have 43 recipes using ${AUTOREV} in fso-autorev.inc,
> and 96 recipes using ${AUTOREV} in insane-srcrevs.inc (sic :-)). And
> the "insane" ones include matchbox-panel-2, which is one of the recipes
> that I hit an error with.
>
> > no recipe in shr-t is using latest VCS tip, shr-autorev is not included
> > in distro config in shr-t branches.
>
> I'm seeing all of the above under shr-testing, and with all of the
> .git's on branches that I thought were right for SHR-T. (This is
> described fully in my earlier reply to Thomas Zimmermann.)
/etc/shr-version confused you with tag/branch in it.. but I'll reply to
that e-mail.
> But anyway, I understand now that much depends on the ${AUTOREV} in
> those .inc files, so I'll go looking for how to control those better...
Yes, but you have to count only those .inc files which ARE included to
your build. As I said shr-t doesn't include shr-autorev. Shr-u does not
include fso-autorev or instane-srcrevs.inc.
> Many thanks,
> Neil
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: [email protected]
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
