On 23 November 2010 23:09, Daniele Ricci <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 21:01, Bryan Petty <[email protected]> wrote: >> This is not true. A patent (6031525) was already filed for >> Quickwriting in 1999/2000: >> http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6031525.html >> >> So if this is actually a duplicate patent, all Ken Perlin has to do is >> point out his patent to the patent office to get the 8pen one >> invalidated. >> > > I guess he won't. Can we do something about this? The patent office > will realize it on its own, right?
I've learned before that a worldwide patent is very expensive (for the patent claimer, about 30.000 €?). So I would wait until the patent is assigned, after that I would show that the patent is void. _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
