On Friday 08 April 2011 01:08:18 Neil Jerram wrote: > Pau Espin Pedrol <[email protected]> writes: > > Nah, now seriously, I think that's there's not a "single" plan because > > we spending our efforts in lots of different places. > > Indeed. In particular, we are dividing our efforts between SHR-T and > SHR-U - in terms both of developer resource and of community attention. > > Since posting my questions I've reflected a bit more and I think this is > my main underlying concern. > > Especially given that SHR-U - which I've been running now for a couple > of months - actually seems very stable, and as far as know has no > significant downsides compared to SHR-T. > > Therefore I wonder if SHR-T is still worthwhile....? > > But, when trying to finalize that question, I realize that it depends on > what is likely to happen - in terms of stability - to SHR-U in the > future. And that in turn depends on what the overall plan for SHR is; > hence my questions.
My plan with SHR-T was to make 2 releases per year, based on the 2nd and 4th stable release of OE in that year. So next testing would be based on OE-2011.05, and this OE release will be based on meta-oe and openembedded-core. The current testing has the problem that after the testing branchpoint unstable switched to gdbus and getting things fixed in the dbus-glib branch was very hard... That the current testing is quite stable is a good sign, so perhaps it will be easier for the next testing. _______________________________________________ Shr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
