You are correct. I was talking about the sound problem.
replying to digest ,messages together with kmail thread order, makes me get 
confused somethimes.  

On Saturday, September 10, 2011 10:25:35 AM Martin Jansa wrote:
> Maybe you're talking about sound module problem, but while replying on
> ML digest with touchscreen problem then it doesn't make much sense to
> me, sorry.
> 
> Regrads,
> 
> > On Friday, September 09, 2011 05:22:46 PM Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 05:23:09PM +0200, Yoram bar-haim wrote:
> > > > I have this module installed but it was not loaded. loading it does
> > > > not solve the problem.
> > > 
> > > No idea what you're talking about..
> > > 
> > > > On Tuesday, September 06, 2011 09:03:51 PM
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > 
> > > > project.org wrote:
> > > > > Send Shr-devel mailing list submissions to
> > > > > 
> > > > >       [email protected]
> > > > > 
> > > > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > > > > 
> > > > >       http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > > > > 
> > > > > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > > > > 
> > > > >       [email protected]
> > > > > 
> > > > > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > > > > 
> > > > >       [email protected]
> > > > > 
> > > > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > > > > than "Re: Contents of Shr-devel digest..."
> > > > > 
> > > > > Today's Topics:
> > > > >    1. Re: event filtering (Martin Jansa)
> > > > >    2. Re: event filtering (Martin Jansa)
> > > > >    3. Re: event filtering (Yoram bar-haim)
> > > > > 
> > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Message: 1
> > > > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:30:07 +0200
> > > > > From: Martin Jansa <[email protected]>
> > > > > Subject: Re: [Shr-Devel] event filtering
> > > > > To: Yoram bar-haim <[email protected]>
> > > > > Cc: [email protected]
> > > > > Message-ID: <[email protected]>
> > > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Yoram bar-haim wrote:
> > > > > > I meant that it works for me and I can confirm the report about
> > > > > > the last shr-2.6.39-nodrm in repository.
> > > > > > my patch did not include 44701728692f6b70c954303db9d8ba20e5701637
> > > > > > (ignore unexpected interrupt) and
> > > > > > 3e661cec4f3f06a004200d254a2c1a31544b61fa (report pressure), so
> > > > > > the problem might be one of those, actually I'm working on it
> > > > > > right now, but without debug board it takes me time...
> > > > > 
> > > > > I've tried to remove both in oe8, but someone reported it still
> > > > > panics. Now I've reverted all 3 again before someone sends working
> > > > > patch (can you send yours?) or I'll be at home to test it on
> > > > > device..
> > > > > 
> > > > > > BTW, what is the correct way do define local source directory for
> > > > > > SRC_URI ? it gives me trubles...
> > > > > 
> > > > > What exactly do you need? You can add patch to SRC_URI and you're
> > > > > all set. If you meant to use own checkout without unpack/patch
> > > > > tasks from bitbake then check conf/local-builds.inc for example
> > > > > how to use srctree gitpkgv classes and for kernel you have to add
> > > > > defconfig to your checkout.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > 
> > > > > > On Saturday, September 03, 2011 09:38:08 AM Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:02:36PM +0300, Yoram bar-haim wrote:
> > > > > > > > I apllied the same patch locally whith minor modifications to
> > > > > > > > the new code base, and it works like black magic...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > What do you mean? Does it work for you but it's black magic or
> > > > > > > it doesn't work?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Because someone reported yesterday that he gets kernel panic as
> > > > > > > soon as he touches TS and I didn't test it on device yet..
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 02:35:04 PM Martin Jansa 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:10:31PM +0300, Yoram bar-haim 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I have it almost done eather, but it's better if you push
> > > > > > > > > > your patch...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Top 3 patches
> > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-nodrm
> > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a=com
> > > > > > > > > mit; h=3a ec4e 8c10 6ed7fb77c94ffcbdad1a66e9f4be85
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > but didn't test it in runtime yet :/
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 01:49:02 PM Martin Jansa
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:21:48AM +0200, Martin Jansa
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:12:20PM +0300, Yoram
> > > > > > > > > > > > bar-haim
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So, does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nodr m already includes the openmoko.patch and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch ? can I just pathc onm top of this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > branch ?
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Btw I have it almost done.. will update to 2.6.39.4 and
> > > > > > > > > > > include 2 ts patches today.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > It will be more clear if you read openmoko.patch and
> > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch headers or repo description on gitorious:
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > kernel repositories used in SHR project
> > > > > > > > > > > > often rebased, so be aware
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > om-2.6.34-stable is based on Openmoko om-2.6.34
> > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog;h=r
> > > > > > > > > > > > efs/ head s/om -2.6 .34 ) and contains latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > stable/longterm upstream patch shr-2.6.34-nodrm is
> > > > > > > > > > > > rebased on top of om-2.6.34-stable and contains
> > > > > > > > > > > > common patches which are also usually included in
> > > > > > > > > > > > qtmoko/debian kernel sources shr-2.6.34 is rebased
> > > > > > > > > > > > on top of shr-2.6.34-nodrm and contains mostly glamo
> > > > > > > > > > > > DRM patches from Thomas White
> > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.bitwiz.org.uk/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog;h
> > > > > > > > > > > > =refs /hea ds/g drm- 2.6 .34)
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > The same for 2.6.37, but without DRM patches.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > openmoko.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from openmoko repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=commit;h=1649
> > > > > > > > > > > > 05f9 f584 3aa9 4b04 eef7 24238c77dc47af0f
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > So for 2.6.39, we have 2.6.39.1 as latest stable
> > > > > > > > > > > > patch (2.6.39 release + 2.6.39.1 patch from tarbal)
> > > > > > > > > > > > shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable is rebased on top of
> > > > > > > > > > > > 2.6.39.1 and used to create openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linu
> > > > > > > > > > > > x-2. 6.3 9.y. git;a =su mmary (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > linux-2.6.39.y/2.6.39.1 > openmoko.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from shr kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > rebased on top of openmoko kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-no
> > > > > > > > > > > > drm
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > >    5
> > > > > > > > > > > >    6 35c701e lis302dl: use ABS events rather then REL
> > > > > > > > > > > >    events 7 1d5cd43 input: lis302dl: fix the resume
> > > > > > > > > > > >    path 8 9521296 lis302dl accelerometer driver
> > > > > > > > > > > >    9 eefe7bf Force GPS power up on resume if it were
> > > > > > > > > > > >    powered up on suspend
> > > > > > > > > > > >   
> > > > > > > > > > > >   10 fd88443 Fix high power consumption in suspend
> > > > > > > > > > > >   11 ae31803 wm8753: use snd_soc_jack on neo1973
> > > > > > > > > > > >   12 104353d ar6000_delay.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > >   13 235c131 usbhost.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > >   14 e342a4d Enable powering off after 8s POWER press
> > > > > > > > > > > >   15 b9dfb66 glamo-display: fix WSOD for 242 timming
> > > > > > > > > > > >   16 d952c22 Openmoko resume reason sysfs node ported
> > > > > > > > > > > >   from 2.6.29 17 2d7ec7a nand/s3c2410: add mising
> > > > > > > > > > > >   badblocksbits value 18 2a067d5 glamo-mci: revert
> > > > > > > > > > > >   changes for Per's patchset 19 d9b3bc8 Revert "mmc:
> > > > > > > > > > > >   add none blocking mmc request function" 20 a194e92
> > > > > > > > > > > >   Revert "mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to list
> > > > > > > > > > > >   all tests" 21 8a3a7aa Revert "mmc: mmc_test: add
> > > > > > > > > > > >   test for none blocking transfers" 22 711299a
> > > > > > > > > > > >   Revert "mmc: add member in mmc queue struct to
> > > > > > > > > > > >   hold request data" 23 101511c Revert "mmc: add a
> > > > > > > > > > > >   block request prepare function" 24 023e4b8 Revert
> > > > > > > > > > > >   "mmc: move error code in
> > > > > > > > > > > >   mmc_block_issue_rw_rq to a separate function." 25
> > > > > > > > > > > >   6dd67d8 Revert "mmc: add a second mmc queue request
> > > > > > > > > > > >   member" 26 cc53cf6 Revert "mmc: add handling for
> > > > > > > > > > > >   two parallel block requests in issue_rw_rq" 27
> > > > > > > > > > > >   76cc5df Revert "mmc: test: add random fault
> > > > > > > > > > > >   injection in core.c"
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > And shr/linux:shr-2.6.39-nodrm is reabased on top of
> > > > > > > > > > > > shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable and shr.patch is created
> > > > > > > > > > > > against om-2.6.39-stable (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > origin/om-2.6.39-stable > shr.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 06:35:53 PM Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Yoram bar-haim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 05:48:49 PM you 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> user space
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~metan/evfilt
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> er/) or switching to tslib was one option, but
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> later we were using kernel patch from Gennady
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Kupava s3c2410_ts: jitter less touchscreen
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> for glamo, version 4 see:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 6.37 -nod rm or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commit/3f2ddad
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 023c 970a 1136 f37b c19e 882eba b3 9d5dc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> directly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch seems to only reduce the frequency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of event, it does not do any filtering or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modification of the events.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which makes events for evdev usable..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW: reducing of event frequency == filtering :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You can try to apply referenced patch to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2.6.39 branch and update it if needed and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> then test it from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone/meta-openmoko/.... Then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> please send tested patch to shr-devel and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I'll apply it to shr-2.6.39-nodrm and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone sooner. Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will try to see what can be done,but I'm not
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sure yet what kind of solution should it be...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Shr-devel mailing list
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Yoram bar-haim wrote:
> > > > > > > I meant that it works for me and I can confirm the report about
> > > > > > > the last shr-2.6.39-nodrm in repository.
> > > > > > > my patch did not include
> > > > > > > 44701728692f6b70c954303db9d8ba20e5701637 (ignore unexpected
> > > > > > > interrupt) and
> > > > > > > 3e661cec4f3f06a004200d254a2c1a31544b61fa (report pressure), so
> > > > > > > the problem might be one of those, actually I'm working on it
> > > > > > > right now, but without debug board it takes me time...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I've tried to remove both in oe8, but someone reported it still
> > > > > > panics.
> > > > > 
> > > > > sorry for confusion
> > > > > thanks to pespin I've noticed that oe7 was the one with only 1 ts
> > > > > patch and oe8 is without ts patches
> > > > > 
> > > > > r2-oe6 was old 2.6.39.1,
> > > > > r3-oe6 was first 2.6.39.4 and had 3 ts patches,
> > > > > r3-oe7 only 1 ts patch
> > > > > r3-oe8 is 2.6.39.4 without ts patches
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Now I've reverted all 3 again before someone sends working patch
> > > > > > (can you send yours?) or I'll be at home to test it on device..
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > BTW, what is the correct way do define local source directory
> > > > > > > for SRC_URI ? it gives me trubles...
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > What exactly do you need? You can add patch to SRC_URI and you're
> > > > > > all set. If you meant to use own checkout without unpack/patch
> > > > > > tasks from bitbake then check conf/local-builds.inc for example
> > > > > > how to use srctree gitpkgv classes and for kernel you have to
> > > > > > add defconfig to your checkout.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Saturday, September 03, 2011 09:38:08 AM Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:02:36PM +0300, Yoram bar-haim 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > I apllied the same patch locally whith minor modifications
> > > > > > > > > to the new code base, and it works like black magic...
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > What do you mean? Does it work for you but it's black magic
> > > > > > > > or it doesn't work?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Because someone reported yesterday that he gets kernel panic
> > > > > > > > as soon as he touches TS and I didn't test it on device
> > > > > > > > yet..
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 02:35:04 PM Martin Jansa 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:10:31PM +0300, Yoram bar-haim
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > I have it almost done eather, but it's better if you
> > > > > > > > > > > push your patch...
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Top 3 patches
> > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-nodrm
> > > > > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > > > http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a=c
> > > > > > > > > > ommi t;h= 3aec4e 8c10 6ed7fb77c94ffcbdad1a66e9f4be85
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > but didn't test it in runtime yet :/
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 01:49:02 PM Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:21:48AM +0200, Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:12:20PM +0300, Yoram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > bar-haim
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.3
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9-no drm already includes the openmoko.patch and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch ? can I just pathc onm top of this
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > branch ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > Btw I have it almost done.. will update to 2.6.39.4
> > > > > > > > > > > > and include 2 ts patches today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > It will be more clear if you read openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and shr.patch headers or repo description on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > gitorious:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > kernel repositories used in SHR project
> > > > > > > > > > > > > often rebased, so be aware
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > om-2.6.34-stable is based on Openmoko om-2.6.34
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog;h
> > > > > > > > > > > > > =ref s/he ads/om -2.6 .34 ) and contains latest
> > > > > > > > > > > > > stable/longterm upstream patch shr-2.6.34-nodrm is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rebased on top of om-2.6.34-stable and contains
> > > > > > > > > > > > > common patches which are also usually included in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > qtmoko/debian kernel sources shr-2.6.34 is rebased
> > > > > > > > > > > > > on top of shr-2.6.34-nodrm and contains mostly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > glamo DRM patches from Thomas White
> > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.bitwiz.org.uk/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog;
> > > > > > > > > > > > > h=r efs/h eads/g drm- 2.6 .34)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > The same for 2.6.37, but without DRM patches.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > openmoko.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from openmoko repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=commit;h=16
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 4905 f9f5 843aa9 4b04 eef7 24238c77dc47af0f
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > So for 2.6.39, we have 2.6.39.1 as latest stable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > patch (2.6.39 release + 2.6.39.1 patch from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > tarbal) shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable is rebased on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > top of 2.6.39.1 and used to create openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/l
> > > > > > > > > > > > > inux- 2.6 .39.y. git;a =su mmary (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > linux-2.6.39.y/2.6.39.1 > openmoko.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from shr kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > rebased on top of openmoko kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > nodr m
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    5
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    6 35c701e lis302dl: use ABS events rather then
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    REL events 7 1d5cd43 input: lis302dl: fix the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    resume path 8 9521296 lis302dl accelerometer
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    driver 9 eefe7bf Force GPS power up on resume
> > > > > > > > > > > > >    if it were powered up on suspend
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   10 fd88443 Fix high power consumption in suspend
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   11 ae31803 wm8753: use snd_soc_jack on neo1973
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   12 104353d ar6000_delay.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   13 235c131 usbhost.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   14 e342a4d Enable powering off after 8s POWER
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   press 15 b9dfb66 glamo-display: fix WSOD for 242
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   timming 16 d952c22 Openmoko resume reason sysfs
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   node ported from 2.6.29 17 2d7ec7a nand/s3c2410:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   add mising badblocksbits value 18 2a067d5
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   glamo-mci: revert changes for Per's patchset 19
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   d9b3bc8 Revert "mmc: add none blocking mmc
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   request function" 20 a194e92 Revert "mmc:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   mmc_test: add debugfs file to list all tests" 21
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   8a3a7aa Revert "mmc: mmc_test: add test for none
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   blocking transfers" 22 711299a Revert "mmc: add
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   member in mmc queue struct to hold request data"
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   23 101511c Revert "mmc: add a block request
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   prepare function" 24 023e4b8 Revert "mmc: move
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   error code in mmc_block_issue_rw_rq to a
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   separate function." 25 6dd67d8 Revert "mmc: add
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   a second mmc queue request member" 26 cc53cf6
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   Revert "mmc: add handling for two parallel block
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   requests in issue_rw_rq" 27 76cc5df Revert "mmc:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >   test: add random fault injection in core.c"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > And shr/linux:shr-2.6.39-nodrm is reabased on top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > of shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable and shr.patch is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > created against om-2.6.39-stable (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > origin/om-2.6.39-stable > shr.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 06:35:53 PM Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Yoram bar-haim
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 05:48:49 PM you
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> user space
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~metan/evfi
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> lter /) or switching to tslib was one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> option, but later we were using kernel
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> patch from Gennady Kupava s3c2410_ts:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> jitter less touchscreen for glamo, version
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 4 see:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2.6. 37-n odrm or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commit/3f2dd
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ad02 3c97 0a1136 f37b c19e 882eba b3 9d5dc
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> directly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch seems to only reduce the frequency
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > of event, it does not do any filtering or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > modification of the events.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which makes events for evdev usable..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW: reducing of event frequency == filtering
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You can try to apply referenced patch to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2.6.39 branch and update it if needed and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> then test it from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone/meta-openmoko/.... Then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> please send tested patch to shr-devel and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I'll apply it to shr-2.6.39-nodrm and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone sooner. Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will try to see what can be done,but I'm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not sure yet what kind of solution should it
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > Shr-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 02:30:07PM +0200, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 03, 2011 at 12:00:08PM +0200, Yoram bar-haim wrote:
> > > > > > > > I meant that it works for me and I can confirm the report
> > > > > > > > about the last shr-2.6.39-nodrm in repository.
> > > > > > > > my patch did not include
> > > > > > > > 44701728692f6b70c954303db9d8ba20e5701637 (ignore unexpected
> > > > > > > > interrupt) and
> > > > > > > > 3e661cec4f3f06a004200d254a2c1a31544b61fa (report pressure),
> > > > > > > > so the problem might be one of those, actually I'm working
> > > > > > > > on it right now, but without debug board it takes me time...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I've tried to remove both in oe8, but someone reported it still
> > > > > > > panics.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > sorry for confusion
> > > > > > thanks to pespin I've noticed that oe7 was the one with only 1 ts
> > > > > > patch and oe8 is without ts patches
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > r2-oe6 was old 2.6.39.1,
> > > > > > r3-oe6 was first 2.6.39.4 and had 3 ts patches,
> > > > > > r3-oe7 only 1 ts patch
> > > > > > r3-oe8 is 2.6.39.4 without ts patches
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Now I've reverted all 3 again before someone sends working
> > > > > > > patch (can you send yours?) or I'll be at home to test it on
> > > > > > > device..
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > BTW, what is the correct way do define local source directory
> > > > > > > > for SRC_URI ? it gives me trubles...
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > What exactly do you need? You can add patch to SRC_URI and
> > > > > > > you're all set. If you meant to use own checkout without
> > > > > > > unpack/patch tasks from bitbake then check
> > > > > > > conf/local-builds.inc for example how to use srctree gitpkgv
> > > > > > > classes and for kernel you have to add defconfig to your
> > > > > > > checkout.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Saturday, September 03, 2011 09:38:08 AM Martin Jansa 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 07:02:36PM +0300, Yoram bar-haim 
wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > I apllied the same patch locally whith minor
> > > > > > > > > > modifications to the new code base, and it works like
> > > > > > > > > > black magic...
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > What do you mean? Does it work for you but it's black magic
> > > > > > > > > or it doesn't work?
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Because someone reported yesterday that he gets kernel
> > > > > > > > > panic as soon as he touches TS and I didn't test it on
> > > > > > > > > device yet..
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 02:35:04 PM Martin Jansa
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 02:10:31PM +0300, Yoram
> > > > > > > > > > > bar-haim
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > I have it almost done eather, but it's better if you
> > > > > > > > > > > > push your patch...
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Top 3 patches
> > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.39-nodr
> > > > > > > > > > > m and
> > > > > > > > > > > http://git.shr-project.org/git/?p=meta-smartphone.git;a
> > > > > > > > > > > =com mit; h= 3aec4e 8c10 6ed7fb77c94ffcbdad1a66e9f4be85
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > but didn't test it in runtime yet :/
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Thursday, September 01, 2011 01:49:02 PM Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 01, 2011 at 09:21:48AM +0200, Martin
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Jansa
> > > > 
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 07:12:20PM +0300, Yoram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > bar-haim
> > > > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, does
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > .39- nodr m already includes the openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and shr.patch ? can I just pathc onm top of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > this branch ?
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Btw I have it almost done.. will update to 2.6.39.4
> > > > > > > > > > > > > and include 2 ts patches today.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > It will be more clear if you read openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > and shr.patch headers or repo description on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > gitorious:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > kernel repositories used in SHR project
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > often rebased, so be aware
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > om-2.6.34-stable is based on Openmoko om-2.6.34
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlog
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > ;h=r efs/ he ads/om -2.6 .34 ) and contains
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > latest stable/longterm upstream patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shr-2.6.34-nodrm is rebased on top of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > om-2.6.34-stable and contains common patches
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > which are also usually included in qtmoko/debian
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > kernel sources shr-2.6.34 is rebased on top of
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shr-2.6.34-nodrm and contains mostly glamo DRM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > patches from Thomas White
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > (http://git.bitwiz.org.uk/?p=kernel.git;a=shortlo
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > g;h =ref s/h eads/g drm- 2.6 .34)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > The same for 2.6.37, but without DRM patches.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > openmoko.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from openmoko repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.openmoko.org/?p=kernel.git;a=commit;h=
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1649 05f9 f5 843aa9 4b04 eef7 24238c77dc47af0f
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > So for 2.6.39, we have 2.6.39.1 as latest stable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > patch (2.6.39 release + 2.6.39.1 patch from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > tarbal) shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable is rebased on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > top of 2.6.39.1 and used to create
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > openmoko.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > /linu x-2. 6 .39.y. git;a =su mmary (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > linux-2.6.39.y/2.6.39.1 > openmoko.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > shr.patch header:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > All patches from shr kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > rebased on top of openmoko kernel repository
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/shr-2.6.3
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 9-no drm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    5
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    6 35c701e lis302dl: use ABS events rather then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    REL events 7 1d5cd43 input: lis302dl: fix the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    resume path 8 9521296 lis302dl accelerometer
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    driver 9 eefe7bf Force GPS power up on resume
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >    if it were powered up on suspend
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   10 fd88443 Fix high power consumption in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   suspend 11 ae31803 wm8753: use snd_soc_jack on
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   neo1973 12 104353d ar6000_delay.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   13 235c131 usbhost.patch
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   14 e342a4d Enable powering off after 8s POWER
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   press 15 b9dfb66 glamo-display: fix WSOD for
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   242 timming 16 d952c22 Openmoko resume reason
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   sysfs node ported from 2.6.29 17 2d7ec7a
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   nand/s3c2410: add mising badblocksbits value
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   18 2a067d5 glamo-mci: revert changes for Per's
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   patchset 19 d9b3bc8 Revert "mmc: add none
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   blocking mmc request function" 20 a194e92
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   Revert "mmc: mmc_test: add debugfs file to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   list all tests" 21 8a3a7aa Revert "mmc:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   mmc_test: add test for none blocking
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   transfers" 22 711299a Revert "mmc: add member
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   in mmc queue struct to hold request data" 23
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   101511c Revert "mmc: add a block request
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   prepare function" 24 023e4b8 Revert "mmc: move
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   error code in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   mmc_block_issue_rw_rq to a separate function."
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   25 6dd67d8 Revert "mmc: add a second mmc queue
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   request member" 26 cc53cf6 Revert "mmc: add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   handling for two parallel block requests in
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   issue_rw_rq" 27 76cc5df Revert "mmc: test: add
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >   random fault injection in core.c"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > And shr/linux:shr-2.6.39-nodrm is reabased on top
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > of shr/linux:om-2.6.39-stable and shr.patch is
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > created against om-2.6.39-stable (git diff
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > origin/om-2.6.39-stable > shr.patch)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 06:35:53 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin Jansa
> > > > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Yoram
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > bar-haim <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, August 31, 2011 05:48:49 PM
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > you
> > 
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> user space
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> (http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~metan/ev
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> filt er/) or switching to tslib was one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> option, but later we were using kernel
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> patch from Gennady Kupava s3c2410_ts:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> jitter less touchscreen for glamo,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> version 4 see:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commits/sh
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> r-2. 6.37 -n odrm or
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> https://gitorious.org/shr/linux/commit/3f2
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> ddad 023c 97 0a1136 f37b c19e 882eba b3
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 9d5dc directly
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch seems to only reduce the
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > frequency of event, it does not do any
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > filtering or modification of the events.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Which makes events for evdev usable..
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > BTW: reducing of event frequency == filtering
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > :)
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> You can try to apply referenced patch to
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 2.6.39 branch and update it if needed and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> then test it from
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone/meta-openmoko/.... Then
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> please send tested patch to shr-devel and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> I'll apply it to shr-2.6.39-nodrm and
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> meta-smartphone sooner. Thanks!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Regards,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I will try to see what can be done,but I'm
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > not sure yet what kind of solution should
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it be...
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Shr-devel mailing list
> > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > > > > 
> > > > > ------------------------------
> > > > > 
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Shr-devel mailing list
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > End of Shr-devel Digest, Vol 30, Issue 7
> > > > > ****************************************
> > > > 
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Shr-devel mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Shr-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel
_______________________________________________
Shr-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-devel

Reply via email to