On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Steven ** <[email protected]<montgoss%[email protected]> > wrote:
> As long as they are easy to install after the fact and it's obvious > when something isn't working because of a missing module, I'd be fine > with removing all modules that aren't needed for core/basic > functionality. > > -Steven > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Tom<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > We (many people) discussed on IRC about reducing SHR fat from the lite > > image, we found many heavy and useless packages installed by default and > of > > course dropped them (a very obvious example: tcpdump). > > After that, we decided to attack the kernel modules mess (as suggested in > a > > ticket in our trac iirc), I attached (and also linked to the wiki page) a > > list of kernel modules installed in shr by default, > > please tell us what you think (i.e which to remove). Play try to avoid > > echoing (i.e writing I agree with X) as it'll just make our work harder > :) > > > > I actually think a wiki page is most suitable for this kind of work, so I > > also created a wiki page, please consider editing that instead of > replying > > here! > > > > wiki: http://wiki.shr-project.org/trac/wiki/Kernel%20Modules > > > > -- > > Tom. > > > > I disagree! The phone should be able to provide cool (though basic) funcutunality like being able to read a usb stick! If that's what you meant, (i.e keep those) that's where we are heading, though I opened this wiki page to help us mark what's important and what's not. -- Tom.
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
