On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 14:32 +0100, Martin Jansa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 09:20:59PM +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-02-23 at 06:59 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: > > I'd suggest removing the calibrate to shr-settings - its not needed > > except for fine tuning for only a few folks from what I can see and it > > is too easy to kill the system without a way to recover. > > 1) it shouldn't disappear with images with fsoraw included (but > sometimes fsodeviced seems not running properly in time to request > Display resource :/ > > 2) I already asked xinput-calibartor developer (Tias) to add confirmation > dialog in the end of calibrating session, which would safe all those > cases and save only valid configuration > > 3) I agree that it's safer to remove it now and readd with confirmation > dialog later (sorry for that I didn't expect that it would take much > longer). I'll ask him again if he has any ETA and then maybe remove it > from /etc/X11/Xsession.d/89xTs_Calibrate temporary. >
The question to ask is why add it at all? - I cant see a reason for it as the mailing list isnt flooded by people complaining their FR screen is not calibrated. If its not essential (and it clearly isnt), its a utility that can be called up if needed and not something essential for the first boot wizard. BillK > On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 09:48:43PM +0100, Tias wrote: > > Hey Martin, > > > > Just a short message that I got your email well, and that I will > > look into it during the coming weeks. I have to recover from my > > FOSDEM overload first, and got some other things to finish before. > > > > I'll get back to you soon. > -- William Kenworthy <[email protected]> Home in Perth! _______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
