Łukasz Pankowski wrote:
Pander <[email protected]> writes:
Pander wrote:
Tom Hacohen wrote:
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 5:46 PM, Pander <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi all,
I have been testing the new testing and it looks great. Congratulations
especially on the speed improvement.
One major request, or at least my 2 cents, would be to replace the
default QWERTY-keyboard with this one:
http://www.opkg.org/package_180.html
It has the same keys only much bigger which improves every day usage.
Regards,
Pander
_______________________________________________
You can, if you want, start a poll in shr-user.
OK. So... +1 for me :) What do you all vote?
Please, no -1 if you don't use the standard QWERTY keyboard all
together. Make it 0 if you simply don't care. Thanks for all the replies
so far.
+1, seems much better than default, which has extremely small keys for
no reason (plenty empty space around), this one is much better
(though I use OptimSMS2
http://www.opkg.org/package_333.html)
i've always presumed that the space between is just graphical, and
doesn't make any difference to detection of taps, in which case the
spacing makes the keys easier to make out visually.
with my fat fingers i value the space between the edge of the screen and
the outer keys as the raised case makes it hard to hit stuff near the edge.
tim abell
just another user
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
