On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:07 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > 02.09.2010 11:08, Davide Scaini пишет: > > latest shr-u with lates kernel and modules + latest qi > > installation on sd > > works almost perfectly (some issues from kernel side) > > If "unstable" works better than "testing" maybe we should just swap the > names? :) > > Max. >
never said anything like this. Just pointing out that even shr-u works great, so just try one ;) exact image? try! from here latest shr-u: http://build.shr-project.org/shr-unstable/images/om-gta02/ or the latest .29 was better than .32, so here you are: http://build.shr-project.org/shr-unstable.29/images/om-gta02/ or testing, simply just working ;) http://build.shr-project.org/shr-testing/images/om-gta02/ bye d
_______________________________________________ Shr-User mailing list [email protected] http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user
