On Tue, 19 Apr 2011 11:18:54 +0200
Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:24:41PM +0200, Ole Carlsen wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 20:13:23 +0200
> > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 08:03:33PM +0200, Ole Carlsen wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 19:57:38 +0200
> > > > Martin Jansa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 07:48:51PM +0200, Ole Carlsen wrote:
> > > > > > Hi
> > > > > > I have tried newest image for SHR unstable, SHR core, and
> > > > > > SHR tests/unstable they all kernel panic on startup. SHR
> > > > > > testing works fine.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Which shr-u image have you tried? version? jffs2/ubi/tar.gz?
> > > > > 
> > > > > ubi are known to have issues when written by dfu-util,
> > > > > (nand-write works)
> > > > 
> > > > ubi and I have been through this before where I ended with an
> > > > older unstable and then just ran update && upgrade. I would
> > > > guess that jffs2 works or at least that's how it turned out
> > > > last time. With testing it is also the ubi version I use and
> > > > that one works.
> > > 
> > > Please keep discussion on ML
> > > 
> > > you can try what worked for GNUtoo
> > > 13:35 < GNUtoo> JaMa|Wrk, ubifs+om-gta02+nand-scrub works
> > > 13:35 < GNUtoo> using dfu-utils
> > > ...
> > > 13:41 < JaMa|Wrk> GNUtoo: -scrub?
> > > 13:42 < JaMa|Wrk> UBI handles flash bit-flips
> > > 13:42 < JaMa|Wrk> Scrubbing, by moving data from physical
> > > eraseblocks which have bit-flips to other physical eraseblocks.
> > > 13:42 < JaMa|Wrk> Scrubbing is done transparently in background
> > > and is hidden from upper layers. 13:44 < JaMa|Wrk> so it's
> > > related to ECC we maybe (I don't remember) enabled in kernel
> > > config? 13:45 < JaMa|Wrk>
> > > http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/openmoko-kernel/2010-November/011276.html
> > >  ...
> > > 16:27 < GNUtoo> I did nand scrub as described on the wiki 16:27 <
> > > GNUtoo> and now it works 16:27 < GNUtoo> no idea of the exact
> > > GNUtoo> cause
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> but I already tried mtd utils 1.3 like that
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> I rm-ed the more recent mtd-utils
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> I bitbaken an image
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> it rebuilt mtd-utils
> > > 16:28 < JaMa|Wrk> this wiki?
> > > http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NAND_bad_blocks 16:28 < GNUtoo> and
> > > built the image 16:28 < GNUtoo> yes
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> and it didn't work
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> then today I tried nand scrub
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo> and it worked with the last SHR image
> > > 16:28 < GNUtoo>
> > > http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/NAND_bad_blocks#Clearing_BadBlocks
> > > 16:29 < JaMa|Wrk> with u-boot from NOR, right? 16:29 < GNUtoo> yes
> > > 16:29 < GNUtoo> basically I did that:
> > > 16:29 < GNUtoo> *boot on NOR uboot
> > > 16:29 < JaMa|Wrk> interesting
> > > 16:29 < GNUtoo> *run the wiki commands
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> *power off
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> *power on to NOR uboot again
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> *flash QI
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> *flash uImage
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> *flash rootfs
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> and reboot
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> note that I didn't run theses commands:
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> dynenv set u-boot_env
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> saveenv
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> because they were useless
> > > 16:30 < GNUtoo> since I used QI
> > > 
> > > there were mtd-utils update patches sent to oe ML this week, but
> > > our buildhost is doing rebuild from scratch right now so it will
> > > take at least a week before new images with those patches are
> > > created..
> 
> I had to restart build, so there are new om-gta02 images created with
> newer mtd-utils (without alignment issue), please try and report if
> ubi images work again
> http://build.shr-project.org/shr-unstable/images/om-gta02/
> 
> FYI: feed is not yet fully poppulated

At the moment I'm not able to get any of the SHR images to work.
Looks more and more like a bad weather and easter project for me.

-- 
Ole @ Carlsen-web.dk
_______________________________________________
Shr-User mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.shr-project.org/mailman/listinfo/shr-user

Reply via email to