Terry Manderson wrote:
> I feel unable to say either way at present.
> 
...
> 
> A direct link to the Patent Application would be appreciated!

Ditto. I'm reluctant to take any stance on this draft without more
information on what the patent claims.

Additionally, I'd like to see a clear statement as to what this draft
says for which the existing draft-ietf-sidr-roa-validation is insufficient.

Rob

-- 
Robert Loomans                         email:       robe...@apnic.net
Senior Software Engineer, APNIC        sip:    robe...@voip.apnic.net
http://www.apnic.net/                  phone:         +61 7 3858 3100
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr

Reply via email to