On Nov 4, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
...
but, in that case, is not the largest part of the problem still
getting
the grandparent(s) to swing the covering resource set(s) to new
parent(s)? is not the cp-compliance issue but one very small part
of of
the criteria on which i and my grandparent(s) choose new parent(s)?
Use case:
1) New CP comes out and specifies minimum standards in the area of
Facility, Management, And Operational Controls (rather the delegation
of such to the CPS)
2) Existing RPKI service providers need to assess this and decide
implications therein
3) If existing RPKI providers can't/won't meet the requirements, and
exit the business, they want to do so within 1 month due to 9.12.2 (to
prevent having non-CP compliant certs out there)
You've got the time left over, after the RPKI service provider exits
the field, to scramble with the grandparent to select new service
providers...
Hence, my suggestion that 30 days notice is rather short.
/John
_______________________________________________
sidr mailing list
sidr@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
