> I suggest to the working group that we could proceed with the current > draft as the abstract model for route validation, and leave open the > potential for other drafts that bring proposals for implementation > specifics for route validation. (And that we should begin working on > such implementation drafts.)
having spent the last weeks, and specifically the last two days in the bay area, discussing this with bgp implementors, i can not support this position. we will be presenting a more realistic approach in anaheim. randy _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
