On 7/8/10 1:23 AM, Rob Austein wrote: > At Thu, 8 Jul 2010 08:18:44 +1000, Geoff Huston wrote: >> >> d) use a) but allow the sender to have a time equal to or higher than the >> time of the previous request >> >> my understanding of this is: >> pros - already in the CMS >> cons - rapid fire replay and reordering is possible. Is reordering >> of messages (request and revoke) a concern here? >> >> My personal opinion is that d) would be adequate as long as the >> potential for MITM reordering was considered to be relatively >> harmless. Is this the case? > > That's my take as well.
We have not yet implemented up-down. But as far as I can tell from following the mailing list discussion and just looking at the draft I am in favour of dropping TLS and this option d seems okay to me as well. It's probably good to have an item on this in Maastricht to make sure there is consensus as Rob suggested in his first mail in this thread. Cheers, Tim > _______________________________________________ > sidr mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
