On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 05:41:01AM -0400, Sriram, Kotikalapudi wrote: > Thanks, Jeff. > One more clarification request: > What do you mean when you say "first non-sequence AS"?
I mean I had a typo. That should have read first non-set AS. Just to be clear, consider the following cases: 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 [3 4 5] Aggregator 1 1 2 [3 4 5] Aggregator 2 1 2 [3 4] 5 In the first and fourth cases have 5 being the origin. The second case, 2 shouldn't be an origin and the path should be considered ineligible for ROA validation. The third case, 2 could be considered as the origin for ROA validation per your draft. Sorry for the confusion. -- Jeff _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list sidr@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
