On Jan 27, 2011, at 12:16 PM, Stephen Kent wrote: > > I'd like SIDR to consider adopting a threat model for BGP path secruity > as a WG item, and offer this as a starting point for the discussion (if > the WG agrees to pursue this topic).
Thanks Steve for posting this, as many have noted path security is necessary and very important to secure inter-domain routing. For the chairs, As a point of order, are we agreeing now that the WG is going to address path security? In resource certification repositories? or routing protocols themselves? Given that my _comments previously were constrained by this, I do hope we agree addressing path security will now be in charter and within scope of the WG - or perhaps we create a new WG that works on items beyond resource certification and RPKI and focuses on routing protocols - or if they're attempting to adapt current protocols (e.g., BGP) then the extensions be performed in those respective working groups (e.g., IDR)? That said, I do hope we don't assume that discussions of path security in a routing protocol should be constrained by the RPKI architecture itself. -danny _______________________________________________ sidr mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sidr
